Solutions
Tool cost is usually a figure someone remembers from the last job that looked like this one. Partimation prices dies, molds, patterns and core boxes through one shared block-and-machining model and amortizes the tool into the per-piece should-cost curve, so the number has a basis you can push back on.
Where it shows up
Somebody remembers what the last die block cost, adds a bit for this part being bigger, and that becomes the tooling line. The job it came from ran a different alloy, a different cavity count, and was quoted three years ago.
A molder sends a lump sum for the mold, a foundry sends a lump sum for the pattern and core boxes, and neither breaks down. You either take the number or start an argument you have no figures for.
Two suppliers, two conventions, two ways of deciding what counts as tooling. When they disagree by a factor you can't explain, there is no independent basis to say which one is out of line.
The tool is discussed as a one-off cheque and the piece price is discussed per part, and nobody puts them on the same curve to show the quantity where the tool actually pays for itself.
What it costs
Two ways, both expensive. Quote the tool high and the job goes elsewhere on a figure nobody could defend if asked. Quote it low and the shortfall comes out of the piece price for the life of the program — a die priced off a job that never had this cavity count, amortized over a quantity that never ships. Neither shows up until the work is already yours or already gone, and by then the tooling line has become the number everyone remembers for the next one.
How it plays out
Drop in the STL or STEP model, or the drawing, and the first look comes off the geometry in front of you rather than the job it reminds someone of. PartDFM.
Die, mold, pattern or core box, all priced through one shared block-and-machining model — reused across HPDC, permanent-mold, injection and forging, so tooling from different processes ends up on one comparable basis. ToolDFM.
Tooling amortizes into the per-piece should-cost curve against a stated tool life rather than sitting as a lump sum, and every cost line traces back to a named rate, posture setting or engine rule. CostDFM.
Should-cost curves run at every quantity, with the exact crossover where one manufacturing method gets cheaper than another solved in closed form instead of eyeballed off a chart. ProcessDFM.
Already shipped
The useful part isn't that Partimation prices tooling. It's that a sand pattern, an injection mold, a permanent-mold die and a forge die all price through the same block-and-machining model, reused unmodified. One basis under all four is what makes their numbers comparable to each other at all — and what lets you say which supplier's tooling line is the odd one out, using a figure of your own rather than a feeling.
Built into ToolDFM.
Built into CostDFM.
Built into ProcessDFM.
Built into PartDFM.
See it for your team
FAQ
Price the tool off the part instead of off memory. Dies, molds, patterns and core boxes all cost out through one shared block-and-machining model, reused across HPDC, permanent-mold, injection and forging. The figure comes from this part's own geometry and the tool it needs, so a second estimator working the same part lands on the same number rather than a different recollection.
Build a third number you own. Partimation costs the die, mold, pattern or core box the part actually needs through the same model whichever process is quoting. Comparing a molder's lump sum against a foundry's lump sum is guesswork, because the two conventions never matched. Comparing each of them against one independent basis is a conversation with a specific figure in it.
Ask what quantity the tool is amortized over, and on what tool life. Tooling here spreads into the per-piece should-cost curve rather than standing as a lump sum, and every cost line names the rate or rule behind it. That reduces the tooling argument to two answerable questions — the basis and the quantity — instead of one figure with nothing underneath it.
Read the crossover rather than argue it. Should-cost curves run at every quantity, and the exact quantity where one manufacturing method becomes cheaper than another is solved in closed form. A tool nobody would cut for a few hundred pieces can be the obvious answer at ten times that volume, and the curve says where the line sits for this part and your rates.
Get started
Send a model or a drawing and book a walkthrough — or start free and run one through yourself.
Book a demo
Tell us about your shop and we'll set up a walkthrough on a real part.